A PR Guru's Musings is now at www.stuartbruce.biz
 



A PR Guru's Musings is now at www.stuartbruce.biz
  Home
    Unfiled
    Feed Options
    Self Promotion
    Random Musings
    Business
    Business Podcasting
    Good PR Ideas
    Community PR
    Northern Business
    Technology
    Business Blogging
    Public Relations
  About
  Archives
  Guestbook
  Contacts
 


 
Links
   Click here for other web feed options such as My Yahoo
   A PR Guru's Musings Blog

http://20six.co.uk/stuartbruce

powered by
20six.co.uk



 

A journalist's take on using RSS for news releases

Journalist Chris Edwards has an interesting post that is essential reading for any PR thinking of using RSS to provide news release feeds. His main point is that he only wants it if the feed can be personalised to give him just the releases he is interested in. I agree with the principle, although delivering it in practice might be a bit harder to achieve.

7.7.05 09:15


Audio press releasess

PR Week's diary column reports that International Public Relations
Partners is claiming to be the first PR consultancy to offer audio
press releases.



"Most journalists have problems absorbing the volume of written news
via mail, fax and the internet - so now they can listen to a press
release and decide it it is worth following up," explains IPRP's
managing director.



PR Week points out that this earth shattering news was delivered via a written press release.



Thinking that this might be attempt to find another use for podcasts I took a quick look at IPRP's website (warning it is very Flash intensive). But no, not even a copy of the original news release.



In my humble opinion the idea is just plain daft. Listening to just one
'audio press release' would take far longer than scanning dozens of
paper, fax, email and RSS releases.



To prove my point this is what journalist David Tebbutt had to say about podcasts. I wonder how he would react to receiving an audio press release?

8.7.05 10:13


Why do PR?

Phillip Young has responded to Tom Murphy's post on "why you would want
to work in PR" with a post of his own. It looks at why
you would want to study public relations at the University of
Sunderland.



From my stats I can tell that this blog gets quite a few visitors
searching on subjects such as "PR qualifications", "I want to work in
PR" etc. If you're one of those then Phillip's post is well worth a
read.



Although in fairness I'd also point you to Richard Bailey who is a
blogging PR lecturer at Leeds Metropolitan University which was the
first in the UK to offer PR degrees.



I remember attending an IPR
reception to welcome the very first batch of students. I've also been
invited to give talks to the students and have offered work experience
placements to several students, many of whom have gone on to have very
successful PR careers.



I don't know as much about the Sunderland course other than it has some
very enterprising students such as Stephen Davies, the PR Blogger, and that CIPR
President Elect Tony Bradley is very involved.
9.7.05 11:27


Is blogging for small business a waste of time

I've spoken to some small businesses who tell me that they would never have time to blog. They need to be selling.



Tell that to Butler Sheetmetal of the Tinbasher blog fame. Paul Woodhouse is reporting a 35-40% increase in turnover.
11.7.05 16:35


I've been spammed by professionals

I was in London and the Thames Valley all of yesterday to see a client
and have a new business meeting. I returned to the usual deluge of
emails (I have several email addresses and only check one of them on
the road, in theory it should only have important mail).



One of these emails, sent to an address that I use on websites and on-line directories, was from 1000heads who are "experts in digital communication".





Every month your clients are being
discussed by millions of customers, potential customers and
shareholders - and we know what is being said.



You may have read in the latest issue of PRWEEK about how blogs and
online communities can rapidly spread discussions across the web. What
does this mean for your clients? How often are they being discussed?
What issues are being raised? What is the impact of your offline
communications activity? How can you influence these opinions to
generate positive word of mouth for your clients?



As the lead article in PRWEEK said, this offers an opportunity and 'the
lesson for agencies is... to monitor what people are saying about
clients' and to 'join the conversation'.



We at 1000heads have the expertise to help you help your clients. We
currently work with many leading PR agencies and some of the world's
largest companies including Nokia, Sony and Tesco. Through our highly
sophisticated tracking systems, we can show you what the marketplace is
saying about your clients and their products and services.



Furthermore, we can help you increase positive word of mouth and shape
conversations to raise the profile of your clients both on and offline.




If you want to hear what is being said about your clients right now,
then please email me on info@1000heads.com or call me on 01235 862590.
You could also visit our website to find out more by clicking HERE.





Kind regards



Adrian Vann




Just how dumb can you get? I don't belong to the 'Marxist' school of
digital communicators who believe that all unsolicited email is spam.
In fact I am against the idea that you face greater restrictions in
what you can send by email, than you do for what you can by traditional
post.



But, it is about targeting. It is about having an intelligent
conversation. Sending me an unsolicited email about a product or
service that is likely to be of interest to me is fine.


But this email was plain rude. No "Dear Stuart..." or even "Mr Bruce..". No prior
research into who they were trying to establish a dialogue with. If
they are experts they should have known that I was one of the UK's
first PR bloggers (I think Richard Bailey, now of Leeds Metropolitan University, was the first when he still worked in PR consultancy).



Normally this wouldn't have irritated me. But these people claim to be
experts. They work for big brands such as Nokia, Sony, Tesco, Channel 4, Carphone
Warehouse, D&A and Simple.



They do "Brand dialogue to harness the power of internet
communication". They do viral and email marketing (although one does
wonder).



They even "Brand watch.. to find out what is being said about your
business online". So I presume I can expect a comment explaining or
apologising sometime later this morning?



UPDATE: It's even worse. These idiots are sending out HTML email which has just screwed up the layout of my blog.



From what I've seen so far I know PR and marketing students who know
100 times as much as these guys. They obviously don't even half
understand the blogosphere. Concepts like trust, authenticity,
transparency, honesty, listening, understanding and dialogue don't get
much of a look in.



It rather looks like they are simply tying to jump on the bandwagon to
make a quick buck. I pity their first client, it's not fair to learn on
someone elses job. Do it and then you might counsel others.


13.7.05 08:11


Blogging needs to be easier

Shel Holtz has commented on a study by Catalyst Design Group that suggest blog design is a barrier towards blogs entering the mainstream. The Big Blog Company in London disagrees and rather crudely headlines its post "Some bloggers unable to find own arse with both hands".



I'm sorry guys you're wrong. Shel and Catalyst are right. As well as run a PR company with its own blogging practice I'm also an elected councillor for an inner-city ward in south Leeds. As a councillor I've been blogging for about three years. As part of my evaluation of how effective this
is I've done some focus group work with people in the local community.
This on the whole backs up what Shel was saying.



I've always wondered why my councillor blog attracts few comments from
local people, when I know for a fact that they read it. They've told me
and I can see from the logs that people use local libraries to read it.




The strange thing is I get emails from people commenting on topics on
the blog. So why don't they comment. The focus group work revealed that
the reason is simple. They don't know how. They don't understand the
concept of comments. They understand email.



Another point made by Shel is that if people land on an old post in the
blog they don't understand about what they will find on the home page
and the whole way a blog is structured.



I think the Big Blog Company's problem is that they have their heads
far too far up their own *****. They are too familiar with blogs, so
they've forgotten the primary purpose of any communication channel and
that is it should be around the needs of the audience not yourself.



It's a trap that we are all capable of failing in to, but some of us have spotted it and are doing something about it.


14.7.05 11:19


Brilliant PR Opinion

An excellent rant by Tom Murphy over at PR Opinions. Tim Bray has tried to pass expert comment on the 'New Public Relations' except that he's pretty much described what some of us did in the 'Old Public Relations'.



There is so much bullshit around at the moment (Tom tells you how to
find it so I won't bother). All this nonsense about blogging replacing
the old 'command and control' PR with "conversations" and "people that
do the work tell the story".



Sorry to disappoint all you blogging evangelists out there but that's
always what PR has been about. I admit there are a hell of a lot of PR
people out there who mistakenly think they are just a cog in the
marketing machine. But they are wrong, they've always been wrong.



Public relations tools are absolutely part of marketing. But public
relations is far more than just media relations, events and newsletters.



Real public relations has always been about how an organisation
behaves. That's what has the biggest effect on its reputation. That's
what PR looks after. It always been about conversations. The best 'PR'
has always been word-of-mouth and what people working on the frontline
have to say.



So if Tim et al want to have a go at someone they might be better off looking at the advertising industry.

14.7.05 12:01


[first page] [previous page]  [next page]



The weblog's authors are responsible for the contents of this blog. Your free weblog from 20six.co.uk